×

Open WeChat and scan the QR code
Subscribe to our WeChat public account

Home About Us Practices Sectors Professionals News Offices Tahota Cloud Online Join Us Contact us CN EN JP
×

Scan code and share

News

Lawyers form Tahota represented a famous Korean beverage scratch code sales unfair competition case to defend its rights successfully

2025-01-16 Views:43373

Recently, Tahota's Wang Shiying lawyer team and Liao Huaixue lawyer team have successfully represented a case on safeguarding rights of a famous honey product brand in South Korea. In this case, Tahota's lawyer teams in Sichuan and Shangdong worked closely together. With their persistent efforts, the court eventually held that the behavior of the scratch code sales constituted unfair competition and claimed the products in question to be pulled off, which safeguards the legitimate rights and interests of a right holder.


The right holder is a global famous nutrition and health product distribution enterprise in South Korea. Its famous product brands have been repeatedly infringed after entering China, so that the legitimate rights and interests of its exclusive licensed right holder in China have been seriously prejudiced. Investigation revealed that XX food grocery store in Shandong had sold unidentifiable Huanli Drink by scratching the traceability code of the product. The right holder argued that the behavior of XX food grocery store infringed its trademark rights and constituted unfair competition, and therefor filed a lawsuit with the court.

 

The case was heard by the court of second instance, which ultimately found that the behavior of XX food grocery store constituted unfair competition, and the court held that the products sold by them were the same and had a competitive relationship. The secret code set by the right holder is to facilitate the query of information such as commodity circulation and avoid the re-sale of the product, so the Defendant's behavior of covering up the traceability code and consumption period code of the product involved in the case objectively destroys the integrity of the product and subjectively hides the origin of the product to prevent manufacturers from tracking it, disrupting the market competition order, infringing on the legitimate rights and interests of consumers, and constituting unfair competition. 


Copyright TAHOTA LAW FIRM
蜀ICP备09019152号-3

斯蒂芬妮科技网络有限公司  中品科技  万顺鑫机械设备  河北型煤粘合剂  NOMGAL电热水器官网  玉里羊羹專賣店  健身用品  学滨办公  自助餐台设计  长命百岁网  广告设计工作室  周永苗袪痛膏药  榆林市富琪伟业商贸有限公司  东莞市原品制衣有限公司  北京新能传媒有限公司  晟凌国际  荔浦县新领环保工程有限公司  胡炎乱羽  郑州合纵新材料科技有限公司